I started by googling and found the article How to write INSERT if NOT EXISTS queries in standard SQL which talks about mutex tables.
I have a table with ~14 million records. If I want to add more data in the same format, is there a way to ensure the record I want to insert does not already exist without using a pair of queries (i.e., one query to check and one to insert is the result set is empty)?
Does a unique
constraint on a field guarantee the insert
will fail if it’s already there?
It seems that with merely a constraint, when I issue the insert via PHP, the script croaks.
12
10 Answers
Use INSERT IGNORE INTO table
.
There’s also INSERT … ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
syntax, and you can find explanations in 13.2.6.2 INSERT … ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE Statement.
Post from bogdan.org.ua according to Google’s webcache:
18th October 2007
To start: as of the latest MySQL, syntax presented in the title is not
possible. But there are several very easy ways to accomplish what is
expected using existing functionality.There are 3 possible solutions: using INSERT IGNORE, REPLACE, or
INSERT … ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE.Imagine we have a table:
CREATE TABLE `transcripts` ( `ensembl_transcript_id` varchar(20) NOT NULL, `transcript_chrom_start` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, `transcript_chrom_end` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`ensembl_transcript_id`) ) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
Now imagine that we have an automatic pipeline importing transcripts
meta-data from Ensembl, and that due to various reasons the pipeline
might be broken at any step of execution. Thus, we need to ensure two
things:
- repeated executions of the pipeline will not destroy our
> database
- repeated executions will not die due to ‘duplicate
> primary key’ errors.Method 1: using REPLACE
It’s very simple:
REPLACE INTO `transcripts` SET `ensembl_transcript_id` = 'ENSORGT00000000001', `transcript_chrom_start` = 12345, `transcript_chrom_end` = 12678;
If the record exists, it will be overwritten; if it does not yet
exist, it will be created. However, using this method isn’t efficient
for our case: we do not need to overwrite existing records, it’s fine
just to skip them.Method 2: using INSERT IGNORE Also very simple:
INSERT IGNORE INTO `transcripts` SET `ensembl_transcript_id` = 'ENSORGT00000000001', `transcript_chrom_start` = 12345, `transcript_chrom_end` = 12678;
Here, if the ‘ensembl_transcript_id’ is already present in the
database, it will be silently skipped (ignored). (To be more precise,
here’s a quote from MySQL reference manual: “If you use the IGNORE
keyword, errors that occur while executing the INSERT statement are
treated as warnings instead. For example, without IGNORE, a row that
duplicates an existing UNIQUE index or PRIMARY KEY value in the table
causes a duplicate-key error and the statement is aborted.”.) If the
record doesn’t yet exist, it will be created.This second method has several potential weaknesses, including
non-abortion of the query in case any other problem occurs (see the
manual). Thus it should be used if previously tested without the
IGNORE keyword.Method 3: using INSERT … ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE:
Third option is to use
INSERT … ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
syntax, and in the UPDATE part just do nothing do some meaningless
(empty) operation, like calculating 0+0 (Geoffray suggests doing the
id=id assignment for the MySQL optimization engine to ignore this
operation). Advantage of this method is that it only ignores duplicate
key events, and still aborts on other errors.As a final notice: this post was inspired by Xaprb. I’d also advise to
consult his other post on writing flexible SQL queries.
19
and can I combine that with “delayed” to speed the script up?
–yes, insert delayed might speed up things for you. try it out
– knittlYes, and keep in mind that REPLACE INTO does DELETE then INSERT, not UPDATE
– boboboboINSERT … ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
is better since it does not delete the row, preserving anyauto_increment
columns and other data.– redolentJust to inform everyone. Using
INSERT … ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
method does increment any AUTO_INCREMENT column with failed insert. Probably because it’s not really failed, but UPDATE’d.
Solution:
INSERT INTO `table` (`value1`, `value2`)
SELECT 'stuff for value1', 'stuff for value2' FROM DUAL
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM `table`
WHERE `value1`='stuff for value1' AND `value2`='stuff for value2' LIMIT 1)
Explanation:
The innermost query
SELECT * FROM `table`
WHERE `value1`='stuff for value1' AND `value2`='stuff for value2' LIMIT 1
used as the WHERE NOT EXISTS
-condition detects if there already exists a row with the data to be inserted. After one row of this kind is found, the query may stop, hence the LIMIT 1
(micro-optimization, may be omitted).
The intermediate query
SELECT 'stuff for value1', 'stuff for value2' FROM DUAL
represents the values to be inserted. DUAL
refers to a special one row, one column table present by default in all Oracle databases (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DUAL_table). On a MySQL-Server version 5.7.26 I got a valid query when omitting FROM DUAL
, but older versions (like 5.5.60) seem to require the FROM
information. By using WHERE NOT EXISTS
the intermediate query returns an empty result set if the innermost query found matching data.
The outer query
INSERT INTO `table` (`value1`, `value2`)
inserts the data, if any is returned by the intermediate query.
11
can you give some more info on how to use this?
– Alex VThis variant is suitable if no unique key on table exists (
INSERT IGNORE
andINSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY
require unique key constraints)– rabuddeIf you use “from dual” on line 2 instead of “from table”, then you don’t need the “limit 1” clause.
– RichWhat if
stuff for value1
andstuff for value2
are identical? This would throw aDuplicate column name
– RobinInstead of DUAL you can use (at least in mysql) INSERT INTO
table
(value1, value2) SELECT ‘stuff for value1’, ‘stuff for value2’ FROM (select 1) x WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROMtable
WHERE value1=’stuff for value1′ AND value2=’stuff for value2′);– noonex
In MySQL, ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE or INSERT IGNORE can be viable solutions.
An example of ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE update based on mysql.com:
INSERT INTO table (a,b,c) VALUES (1,2,3)
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE c=c+1;
UPDATE table SET c=c+1 WHERE a=1;
An example of INSERT IGNORE based on mysql.com
INSERT [LOW_PRIORITY | DELAYED | HIGH_PRIORITY] [IGNORE]
[INTO] tbl_name [(col_name,...)]
{VALUES | VALUE} ({expr | DEFAULT},...),(...),...
[ ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
col_name=expr
[, col_name=expr] ... ]
Or:
INSERT [LOW_PRIORITY | DELAYED | HIGH_PRIORITY] [IGNORE]
[INTO] tbl_name
SET col_name={expr | DEFAULT}, ...
[ ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
col_name=expr
[, col_name=expr] ... ]
Or:
INSERT [LOW_PRIORITY | HIGH_PRIORITY] [IGNORE]
[INTO] tbl_name [(col_name,...)]
SELECT ...
[ ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
col_name=expr
[, col_name=expr] ... ]
0
Any simple constraint should do the job, if an exception is acceptable. Examples:
- primary key if not surrogate
- unique constraint on a column
- multi-column unique constraint
Sorry if this seems deceptively simple. I know it looks bad confronted to the link you share with us. ;-(
But I nevertheless give this answer, because it seems to fill your need. (If not, it may trigger you updating your requirements, which would be “a Good Thing”(TM) also).
If an insert would break the database unique constraint, an exception is throw at the database level, relayed by the driver. It will certainly stop your script, with a failure. It must be possible in PHP to address that case…
4
i added a clarification to the question – does your answer still apply?
–I believe it does. A unique constraint will cause the failure of incorrect inserts. Note : you have to deal with this failure in your code, but this is quite standard.
– KLEfor now I’m going to stick with the solution I accepted – but will further look into handling INSERT failures etc as the app grows
–INSERT IGNORE
basically changes all errors into warnings so that your script is not interrupted. You can then view any warnings with the commandSHOW WARNINGS
. And another important note: UNIQUE constraints don’t work with NULL values, ie. row1 (1, NULL) and row2 (1, NULL) will both get inserted (unless another constraint such as a primary key is broken). Unfortunate.
Try the following:
IF (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM beta WHERE name="John" > 0)
UPDATE alfa SET c1=(SELECT id FROM beta WHERE name="John")
ELSE
BEGIN
INSERT INTO beta (name) VALUES ('John')
INSERT INTO alfa (c1) VALUES (LAST_INSERT_ID())
END
2
Try This answers are low-value on StackOverflow because they do very little to educate the OP and thousands of future researchers. Please edit this answer to include how the solution works and why it is a good idea.
Perfect solution in case the to-be-matching fields aren’t keys ..!
– Leo
REPLACE INTO `transcripts`
SET `ensembl_transcript_id` = 'ENSORGT00000000001',
`transcript_chrom_start` = 12345,
`transcript_chrom_end` = 12678;
If the record exists, it will be overwritten; if it does not yet exist, it will be created.
2
REPLACE
may delete the row and then insert instead of update. The side effect is that constraints may delete other objects and delete triggers are fired.– xmedekoFrom the MySQL manual: “REPLACE makes sense only if a table has a PRIMARY KEY or UNIQUE index. Otherwise, it becomes equivalent to INSERT, because there is no index to be used to determine whether a new row duplicates another.”
Here is a PHP function that will insert a row only if all the specified columns values don’t already exist in the table.
If one of the columns differ, the row will be added.
If the table is empty, the row will be added.
If a row exists where all the specified columns have the specified values, the row won’t be added.
function insert_unique($table, $vars) { if (count($vars)) { $table = mysql_real_escape_string($table); $vars = array_map('mysql_real_escape_string', $vars); $req = "INSERT INTO `$table` (`". join('`, `', array_keys($vars)) ."`) "; $req .= "SELECT '". join("', '", $vars) ."' FROM DUAL "; $req .= "WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM `$table` WHERE "; foreach ($vars AS $col => $val) $req .= "`$col`='$val' AND "; $req = substr($req, 0, -5) . ") LIMIT 1"; $res = mysql_query($req) OR die(); return mysql_insert_id(); } return False; }
Example usage:
<?php
insert_unique('mytable', array(
'mycolumn1' => 'myvalue1',
'mycolumn2' => 'myvalue2',
'mycolumn3' => 'myvalue3'
)
);
?>
3
Pretty expensive if you have a huge load of insertions.
true, but efficient if you need to add specific checkups
Warning:
mysql_*
extension is deprecated as of PHP 5.5.0, and has been removed as of PHP 7.0.0. Instead, either the mysqli or PDO_MySQL extension should be used. See also the MySQL API Overview for further help while choosing a MySQL API.– Dharman
There are several answers that cover how to solve this if you have a UNIQUE
index that you can check against with ON DUPLICATE KEY
or INSERT IGNORE
. That is not always the case, and as UNIQUE
has a length constraint (1000 bytes) you might not be able to change that. For example, I had to work with metadata in WordPress (wp_postmeta
).
I finally solved it with two queries:
UPDATE wp_postmeta SET meta_value = ? WHERE meta_key = ? AND post_id = ?;
INSERT INTO wp_postmeta (post_id, meta_key, meta_value) SELECT DISTINCT ?, ?, ? FROM wp_postmeta WHERE NOT EXISTS(SELECT * FROM wp_postmeta WHERE meta_key = ? AND post_id = ?);
Query 1 is a regular UPDATE
query without any effect when the data set in question is not there. Query 2 is an INSERT
which depends on a NOT EXISTS
, i.e. the INSERT
is only executed when the data set doesn’t exist.
Something worth noting is that INSERT IGNORE will still increment the primary key whether the statement was a success or not just like a normal INSERT would.
This will cause gaps in your primary keys that might make a programmer mentally unstable. Or if your application is poorly designed and depends on perfect incremental primary keys, it might become a headache.
Look into innodb_autoinc_lock_mode = 0
(server setting, and comes with a slight performance hit), or use a SELECT first to make sure your query will not fail (which also comes with a performance hit and extra code).
2
Why would “gaps in your primary keys” – even potentially – “make a programmer mentally unstable”? Gaps occur all the time in primary keys – every time you delete a record, for example.
–Starting with a
SELECT
defeats the whole purpose of just handing-off a big batch ofINSERT
s and not wanting to worry about duplicates.–
Update or insert without known primary key
If you already have a unique or primary key, the other answers with either INSERT INTO ... ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE ...
or REPLACE INTO ...
should work fine (note that replace into deletes if exists and then inserts – thus does not partially update existing values).
But if you have the values for some_column_id
and some_type
, the combination of which are known to be unique. And you want to update some_value
if exists, or insert if not exists. And you want to do it in just one query (to avoid using a transaction). This might be a solution:
INSERT INTO my_table (id, some_column_id, some_type, some_value)
SELECT t.id, t.some_column_id, t.some_type, t.some_value
FROM (
SELECT id, some_column_id, some_type, some_value
FROM my_table
WHERE some_column_id = ? AND some_type = ?
UNION ALL
SELECT s.id, s.some_column_id, s.some_type, s.some_value
FROM (SELECT NULL AS id, ? AS some_column_id, ? AS some_type, ? AS some_value) AS s
) AS t
LIMIT 1
ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
some_value = ?
Basically, the query executes this way (less complicated than it may look):
- Select an existing row via the
WHERE
clause match. - Union that result with a potential new row (table
s
), where the column values are explicitly given (s.id is NULL, so it will generate a new auto-increment identifier). - If an existing row is found, then the potential new row from table
s
is discarded (due to LIMIT 1 on tablet
), and it will always trigger anON DUPLICATE KEY
which willUPDATE
thesome_value
column. - If an existing row is not found, then the potential new row is inserted (as given by table
s
).
Note: Every table in a relational database should have at least a primary auto-increment id
column. If you don’t have this, add it, even when you don’t need it at first sight. It is definitely needed for this “trick”.
2
Several other answerers have proffered an
INSERT INTO ... SELECT FROM
format. Why did you also?–@warren Either you did not read my answer, you do not understand it, or I didn’t explain it properly. In any case, let me emphasize the following: this is not just a regular
INSERT INTO... SELECT FROM...
solution. Please refer to me a link to an answer that is the same, if you can find it I will delete this answer, otherwise you upvote my answer (deal?). Be sure to verify that the answer you’re going to link only uses 1 query (for update+insert), no transaction, and is able to target any combination of columns that are known to be unique (so separately the columns don’t need to be unique).– Yeti
dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/if.html
See stackoverflow.com/questions/44550788/… for discussion about not burning auto_inc values.
@RickJames – that is an interesting q .. but not sure it’s directly related to this q 🙂
It was mentioned in a comment, and that other Question claimed this Question was an “exact duplicate”. So, I felt that it was a good idea to link the questions together for the benefit of others.
Oh, I never think to look at the side bar.